{"id":1077,"date":"2026-09-30T13:31:31","date_gmt":"2026-09-30T13:31:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/?p=1077"},"modified":"2026-10-19T08:20:48","modified_gmt":"2026-10-19T08:20:48","slug":"what-kenyas-2026-pbo-regulations-mean-for-international-ngos-donors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/30\/what-kenyas-2026-pbo-regulations-mean-for-international-ngos-donors\/","title":{"rendered":"What Kenya\u2019s 2026 PBO Regulations Mean for International NGOs &amp; Donors"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>Navigating the Shift: What Kenya\u2019s 2026 PBO Regulations Mean for International NGOs &amp; Donors<\/u><\/strong><strong><u><\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Civil society organisations have long played an indispensable role in Kenya&#8217;s socio-economic development by complementing government efforts in healthcare, education, humanitarian assistance, environmental conservation, governance, human rights advocacy, poverty alleviation, disaster response and community development. For over three decades, the legal framework governing these organisations was anchored in the Non-Governmental Organizations Co-ordination Act, No. 19 of 1990 (the &#8220;Repealed Act&#8221;), which established the NGO Co-ordination Board as the principal regulator of non-governmental organisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Although the Repealed Act provided the first comprehensive legal framework for the registration and regulation of NGOs in Kenya, it gradually attracted criticism from civil society, development partners and legal practitioners. Concerns centered on the extensive discretionary powers vested in the regulator, inadequate procedural safeguards, lack of transparency in registration and deregistration processes and the absence of a modern governance framework capable of accommodating the evolving nature of non-profit organisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Following the promulgation of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, particularly Articles 10, 31, 36, 47 and 232, there was increasing recognition that the legal framework regulating civil society required reform to align it with constitutional values of transparency, accountability, public participation, fair administrative action and freedom of association.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is against this background that Parliament enacted the <strong>Public Benefits Organizations Act, No. 18 of 2013 (&#8220;the PBO Act&#8221;)<\/strong>. Although the Act received Presidential assent in January 2013, it remained largely unimplemented for more than a decade due to administrative and policy challenges. Following its eventual commencement on 14<sup>th<\/sup> May 2024 and the subsequent publication of the <strong>Public Benefits Organizations Regulations, 2026<\/strong>, Kenya has now entered a new regulatory era for public benefit organisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>Why Was the PBO Act Enacted?<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The enactment of the Public Benefits Organizations Act represented one of the most significant legal reforms affecting Kenya&#8217;s civil society sector since the introduction of the NGO Co-ordination Act in 1990.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Unlike its predecessor, which primarily focused on regulating NGOs, the PBO Act was designed to create an enabling legal environment that recognises the diversity of organisations carrying out charitable, humanitarian and developmental activities. Parliament acknowledged that many organisations pursuing public interest objectives were established under different legal frameworks, including trusts, societies and companies limited by guarantee. Consequently, the new legislation adopts a functional rather than institutional approach by regulating organisations based on the nature of their activities rather than solely on their legal form.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The shift reflects international best practices promoted by the United Nations, the African Commission on Human and Peoples&#8217; Rights and other international bodies, which encourage governments to create enabling legal environments for civil society while ensuring accountability and transparency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Unlike the repealed legislation, the PBO Act seeks not merely to regulate organisations but also to facilitate their establishment, operation and contribution to national development.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>Objects of the Act<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Section 3 of the Act outlines several objectives that collectively seek to strengthen Kenya&#8217;s public benefit sector.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Act seeks to promote and facilitate the establishment of organisations engaged in public benefit activities while creating a transparent, accountable and predictable regulatory framework. It further seeks to encourage good governance, financial accountability and institutional sustainability among public benefit organisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another significant objective is the promotion of collaboration between the Government and civil society organisations. Rather than viewing non-profit organisations purely as regulated entities, the Act recognises them as development partners capable of complementing government efforts in achieving national development goals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The legislation also introduces incentives intended to encourage organisations to register under the Act. These include eligibility for statutory benefits such as tax incentives, access to government partnership programmes and recognition as Public Benefit Organizations under Kenyan law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Collectively, these objectives represent a departure from the regulatory philosophy underpinning the NGO Co-ordination Act, shifting from control to facilitation while maintaining appropriate oversight mechanisms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>Public Benefit Activities<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Act significantly broadens the scope of organisations eligible for registration by recognising numerous public benefit activities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These include, among others:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Poverty eradication;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Education and research;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Healthcare;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Environmental protection;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Human rights promotion;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Good governance and constitutionalism;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Legal aid;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Agriculture and food security;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Water and sanitation;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Disaster preparedness and humanitarian assistance;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Gender equality;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Youth empowerment;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Protection of children;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Support for persons with disabilities;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Arts, culture and sports;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Peacebuilding and conflict resolution.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The emphasis is primarily placed on whether an organization advances a recognized public benefit rather than the administrative label it adopts. This represents a significant conceptual shift from the repealed regime<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>The Repeal of the NGO Co-ordination Act, 1990<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a>One of the most important consequences of the PBO Act is the repeal of the Non-Governmental Organizations Co-ordination Act, 1990.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Although many organisations loosely describe this as simply changing the name of NGOs to Public Benefit Organizations, the legal implications are considerably more profound.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The repealed legislation focused primarily on the registration and supervision of NGOs. By contrast, the PBO Act regulates organisations according to the nature of the public benefit activities they undertake. Consequently, organisations incorporated under different legal regimes including charitable trusts and companies limited by guarantee may qualify for Public Benefit Organization status through the process of bestowment, without necessarily changing their legal personality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Act also replaces the NGO Co-ordination Board with the Public Benefits Organizations Authority, whose mandate extends beyond registration to include facilitating the growth of the sector, maintaining a public register, monitoring compliance, promoting self-regulation and advising Government on matters affecting public benefit organisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Authority is therefore intended to function not merely as a regulator but also as an institutional partner supporting the development of Kenya&#8217;s civil society sector.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>What Does the Repeal Mean for Existing NGOs?<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The repeal of the NGO Co-ordination Act does not invalidate organisations previously registered under the repealed legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Instead, the Act contains transitional provisions recognising the continued existence of such organisations while requiring them to migrate into the new legal framework.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This distinction is important.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Many organisations have assumed that because they possess valid NGO registration certificates issued under the repealed Act, no further action is required. That assumption is legally incorrect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Existing NGOs must comply with the transition framework established under the Act and further elaborated in the Public Benefits Organizations Regulations, 2026. This involves submitting prescribed information to the Public Benefits Organizations Regulatory Authority to facilitate migration into the new regulatory framework.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The transition process is intended to ensure that all organisations eventually operate under one harmonised legal framework while preserving the continuity of their operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>The Long Road to Implementation \u2013 Challenges in Operationalising the PBO Act<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a>Ordinarily, once Parliament enacts legislation and the President assents to it, the expectation is that the relevant Cabinet Secretary will undertake the necessary administrative steps to operationalise the statute. However, implementation of the PBO Act was repeatedly delayed.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The prolonged delay created uncertainty within Kenya&#8217;s civil society sector.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Organisations continued to register under the repealed NGO Co-ordination Act despite Parliament having enacted an entirely new legislative framework. This created an unusual legal situation where the new law existed but could not effectively function because the supporting administrative structures and regulations had not been put in place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The delay also affected donor confidence, institutional planning and long-term governance arrangements for many organisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Civil society organisations argued that the prolonged failure to operationalise the Act undermined Parliament&#8217;s legislative intention and frustrated constitutional principles requiring public bodies to act efficiently, transparently and in accordance with the rule of law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>The Decision in David Calleb Otieno &amp; 2 Others v Attorney General &amp; Another<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a>The implementation stalemate eventually culminated in constitutional litigation.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In <strong><em>David Calleb Otieno &amp; 2 Others v Attorney General &amp; Another<\/em>,<\/strong> the petitioners challenged aspects of the implementation of the Public Benefits Organizations Act and sought judicial intervention concerning the operationalisation of the statutory framework. The petition brought into sharp focus the relationship between legislative intent, executive action and constitutional governance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Among the central issues raised before the Court were whether the implementation framework under the Act complied with constitutional guarantees relating to the freedom of association, fair administrative action, public participation and the rule of law and whether existing organisations registered under the repealed legal framework could be compelled to undergo a fresh registration process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court reiterated that legislation enacted by Parliament cannot be rendered ineffective through administrative inaction. Public authorities are under a constitutional obligation to faithfully implement legislation and exercise statutory powers reasonably, fairly and in accordance with the Constitution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision also underscored the importance of protecting the constitutional right to freedom of association under Article 36 of the Constitution. Civil society organisations perform a vital democratic function by advancing public participation, accountability and socio-economic development. Any regulatory framework governing such organisations must therefore strike an appropriate balance between legitimate regulatory oversight and constitutional freedoms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The judgment further highlighted the need for implementation measures that are transparent, proportionate and consistent with the constitutional principles of fair administrative action under Article 47. The Court recognised that while the State possesses a legitimate interest in regulating public benefit organisations to promote accountability and prevent abuse, such regulation must not impose unnecessary or disproportionate barriers to the lawful operation of civil society organisations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The significance of the <strong><em>David Calleb Otieno<\/em><\/strong> decision extends beyond the parties to the case. It reaffirmed the constitutional principle that statutory reforms enacted by Parliament should be implemented within a reasonable time and that administrative processes must facilitate, rather than frustrate, the enjoyment of constitutional rights. The decision also served as an important catalyst for the eventual operationalisation of the Public Benefits Organizations Act and the subsequent publication of the Public Benefits Organizations Regulations, 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>The Public Benefits Organizations Regulations, 2026 \u2013 Operationalising the Act<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a>While the commencement of the Public Benefits Organizations Act marked a significant milestone, the absence of implementing regulations initially presented a major obstacle to its effective enforcement. Like many framework statutes, the PBO Act established the legal architecture for regulating public benefit organisations but left the procedural details to be prescribed through subsidiary legislation. Without such regulations, important provisions relating to registration, governance, reporting, transition, self-regulation and dispute resolution could not be fully implemented.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The publication of the <strong>Public Benefits Organizations Regulations, 2026<\/strong> therefore represents the final step towards operationalising the Act. The Regulations provide practical guidance to the Public Benefits Organizations Authority, existing NGOs, prospective Public Benefit Organizations and other stakeholders on how the provisions of the Act are to be implemented.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In many respects, the Regulations bridge the gap between legislative intention and administrative practice. They prescribe the forms to be used, timelines for regulatory decisions, governance requirements, reporting obligations and transition procedures, thereby promoting certainty, consistency and transparency within the sector.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>Did the Regulations Address the Challenges that Delayed Implementation?<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the most important questions arising from the publication of the Regulations is whether they adequately address the legal and administrative concerns that had delayed implementation of the Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Although the High Court in <em><strong>David Calleb Otieno &amp; 2 Others v Attorney General &amp; Another<\/strong><\/em> did not rewrite the legislation or prescribe the exact contents of the Regulations, its decision emphasised several constitutional principles that any implementation framework ought to respect. These include the principles of legality, proportionality, transparency, fair administrative action and protection of the constitutional right to freedom of association.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A review of the Regulations demonstrates a conscious effort to establish a more facilitative rather than punitive regulatory framework.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol style=\"list-style-type:lower-alpha\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>First, the Regulations prescribe clear procedures for registration and transition, reducing the uncertainty that previously existed. Unlike the former administrative framework where regulatory processes were often criticised for lacking predictability, the Regulations provide standardised application forms, documentary requirements and statutory timelines within which the Authority is expected to make decisions.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Secondly, the Regulations recognise the importance of self-regulation within the sector. Rather than imposing compulsory membership in umbrella organisations, they establish a voluntary framework through which Public Benefit Organizations may establish <strong>Self-Regulation Forums<\/strong> and <strong>Federations<\/strong> to promote peer accountability, exchange of best practices and sectoral coordination. This reflects international best practice by encouraging accountability from within the sector rather than relying exclusively on state oversight.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Thirdly, the Regulations introduce detailed governance standards. Organizations are now required to maintain proper governance structures, financial records, registers of directors or trustees, audited accounts where applicable and annual reports. They are also required to notify the Authority of significant changes affecting their governance, constitutions, registered offices and senior leadership.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>Transition of Existing NGOs<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Recognising that many organisations required additional time to complete this process, the Government extended the transition period through <strong>Legal Notice No. 85 of 2026<\/strong>, granting existing NGOs additional one-year extension, moving the final deadline to 14<sup>th<\/sup> May 2027.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This extension should not be interpreted as removing the obligation to comply. Rather, it provides organisations with a further opportunity to align themselves with the new legal framework without disrupting their operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Boards and management teams should therefore prioritise completion of the transition process well before expiry of the transition window.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>The Public Benefits Organizations Disputes Tribunal<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the most significant institutional reforms introduced by the PBO Act is the establishment of the <strong>Public Benefits Organizations Disputes Tribunal<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Tribunal serves as an independent quasi-judicial body responsible for determining disputes arising under the Act and acts as an important safeguard against arbitrary regulatory action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>Why The Tribunal Was Established?<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The establishment of the Tribunal reflects Parliament&#8217;s recognition that disputes involving registration, governance and regulation of Public Benefit Organizations require specialised expertise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Rather than requiring organisations to institute judicial review proceedings before the High Court whenever disputes arise, the Tribunal provides an accessible, cost-effective and specialised forum capable of determining disputes efficiently while preserving the constitutional right to fair administrative action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Its establishment also strengthens accountability by ensuring that decisions made by the Public Benefits Organizations Authority remain subject to independent review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>Jurisdiction and Functions<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Per Section 50 of the Act, the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes arising under the PBO Act, including matters relating to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Refusal of registration;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Delay in the determination of registration applications;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Suspension of organisations;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Deregistration;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Regulatory sanctions;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Compliance disputes;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Interpretation of the Act;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Appeals against decisions of the Authority.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Following the judicial demands for complete institutional neutrality in the David Calleb Otieno case, the pioneer panel chaired by Anne Wambui Nderu formally took their oaths of office on 14<sup>th<\/sup> May 2026, positioning the Tribunal as a central guardian of civic space and administrative justice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>Practical Compliance Considerations<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The commencement of the PBO Act and publication of the Regulations require every organisation operating within Kenya&#8217;s public benefit sector to undertake a comprehensive compliance review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Boards of directors, trustees and management teams should consider the following immediate actions:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Review the organisation&#8217;s legal status.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Confirm whether registration or bestowment of PBO status is required.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Complete the transition process if the organisation was previously registered under the repealed NGO Co-ordination Act.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Review constitutions and governance documents to ensure compliance with the Act.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Maintain accurate registers of directors, trustees and members.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Prepare annual reports and audited financial statements aligned with ICPAK accounting standards.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Establish internal policies on governance, financial management, conflicts of interest and regulatory compliance.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Put in place systems for notifying the Authority of material organisational changes.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Train directors and senior management on the new compliance obligations introduced by the Act and the Regulations.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Compliance should no longer be viewed merely as a statutory obligation but as an essential component of good governance, institutional credibility and donor confidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>Conclusion<\/u><\/strong> <strong><u><\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Public Benefits Organizations Act, 2013 marks a significant evolution in the regulation of Kenya&#8217;s civil society sector. By repealing the Non-Governmental Organizations Co-ordination Act, 1990, Parliament shifted the regulatory focus from administrative control towards facilitating organisations that genuinely pursue public benefit activities while strengthening accountability, transparency and good governance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Although implementation of the Act was delayed for several years, the publication of the Public Benefits Organizations Regulations, 2026 has finally provided the procedural framework necessary for its effective operation. Together, the Act and the Regulations establish a comprehensive legal regime governing the registration, management, reporting and oversight of Public Benefit Organizations in Kenya.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The establishment of the Public Benefits Organizations Authority and the Public Benefits Organizations Disputes Tribunal further demonstrates Parliament&#8217;s intention to balance effective regulatory oversight with the protection of constitutional rights and fair Ultimately, the success of the PBO regime will depend not only on effective enforcement by the Authority but also on the willingness of organisations themselves to embrace the principles of accountability, transparency and good governance that underpin the legislation. Organisations that proactively review their governance structures, strengthen internal compliance systems and complete the transition process will be better positioned to continue advancing the public good while operating within Kenya&#8217;s evolving legal landscape.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"205\" src=\"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Disclaimer-1-1024x205.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1068\" srcset=\"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Disclaimer-1-1024x205.png 1024w, https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Disclaimer-1-300x60.png 300w, https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Disclaimer-1-766x153.png 766w, https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Disclaimer-1-1536x307.png 1536w, https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Disclaimer-1-2048x409.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"485\" src=\"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Priscillah-6-1024x485.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1064\" srcset=\"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Priscillah-6-1024x485.png 1024w, https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Priscillah-6-300x142.png 300w, https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Priscillah-6-766x363.png 766w, https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Priscillah-6-1536x728.png 1536w, https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Priscillah-6-2048x970.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Navigating the Shift: What Kenya\u2019s 2026 PBO Regulations Mean for International NGOs &amp; Donors Civil society organisations have long played an indispensable role in Kenya&#8217;s socio-economic development by complementing government efforts in healthcare, education, humanitarian assistance, environmental conservation, governance, human rights advocacy, poverty alleviation, disaster response and community development. For over three decades, the legal [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1079,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1077","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ngo-law"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1077","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1077"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1077\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1080,"href":"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1077\/revisions\/1080"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1079"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1077"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1077"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/baadvocates.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1077"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}